Decentralizing Whiteness: Power, Perspective & the Implications of the 2024 Election
š” Why āDecentralizing Whitenessā Matters More Than Ever
Decentralizing whiteness isnāt about erasing white cultureāitās about dismantling the systems that center whiteness as the default in Americaās cultural, political, and institutional life. As the nation diversifies, especially seen in voter behavior, the imperative of sharing power becomes unavoidable.
š³ļø Electoral Power & White Voting Patterns in 2024
In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, white voters remained a dominant force:
55% of white voters supported Trump (57% in 2020)
White voters still comprised 71% of the electorate
By contrast:
Black voters (ā11% of electorate): 86% backed Harrisāā9.5% of the total vote
Latino voters (ā11%): around 51% supported Harrisāā5.6% of vote
This means thatāeven with overwhelming Democratic supportāvoters of color held far less electoral weight than the much-larger white voter bloc.
š The Central Problem: Whiteness Is Centered by Design
White Americans hold electoral power not because of individuals, but because of deep-rooted systems:
Demographic weight: They remain the largest voting bloc.
Institutional bias: Mechanisms like the Electoral College, Senate structure, and gerrymandering amplify white-centered power.
Cultural influence: Dominant narratives in education, media, and policymaking are still shaped through a white gaze.
Efforts to decentralize whiteness challenge these structuresānot by suppressing white voices, but by elevating the voices and experiences of those historically excluded.
š How Whiteness Shows Up: Beyond the Ballot Box
Decentralizing whiteness means tackling systemic defaults in:
Schools & textbooks: Rewriting U.S. history to include Indigenous genocide, slavery, immigration struggles, and resistance movements.
Media & entertainment: Funding authentic storytelling by creators of color, not just diversity-for-approval.
Workplaces: Changing what āprofessionalismā looks likeāembracing varied cultures, dialects, and dress.
Policy-making: Centering equity across healthcare, housing, voting rights, and criminal justice.
šÆ The Stakes: A Healthier Democracy
As the electorate diversifiesāwith growing representation from Latinos, Asians, immigrants, the multiracial populationāfailing to decentralize whiteness risks minority rule:
Ultra-majority white voting power suppresses rising multiethnic voices.
Electoral gains among people of color (e.g., Hispanic and Black men shifting toward Trump) change patternsābut not the imbalance of power
Only by redistributing influence can democracy reflect the nationās evolving demographics and values.
š ļø Decentralizing Whiteness in Practice
Expand Voting Rights ā Automatic registration, make Election Day a holiday.
Revamp Civics Education ā Teach diverse American histories and global perspectives.
Fund Diverse Media ā Support BIPOC creators defining narratives and culture.
Redesign Work Norms ā Federal guidance on equitable hiring, diverse pipelines, and inclusive leadership.
ā Final Argument: Decentralizing Whiteness = Strengthening Democracy
When whiteness is the default, America treats its history, institutions, and values as singular. That diminishes democracy. Decentralizing whiteness doesnāt take away from anyoneāit adds by embracing multiplicity of voices and power equity.
With white voters still holding the largest sway post-2024āas demographic balance shiftsāthe choice is clear: keep a shrinking majority unilaterally dictating a diverse nationās future, or intentionally redistribute cultural and political power to match America as it is becoming.
š· Suggested Visuals:
Pie charts of 2024 electorate by race and vote (white vs. POC).
Infographic explaining white voter share vs. impact percentages.
Before/after classroom curriculum compare (Eurocentric vs. inclusive).
Icons representing reforms in voting, education, media, workplace.